Methodology · applied since August 2026
How we score
Every platform on this site gets the same treatment: five pillars, fixed weights, published criteria. If we can't verify a claim, it doesn't count.
The five pillars
| Pillar | Weight | What we measure |
|---|---|---|
| Fees | 30% | All-in cost for a typical user: spreads or commissions, conversion fees, withdrawal and inactivity charges, overnight funding. |
| Trust & regulation | 25% | Which regulators oversee the entity you actually sign with; public listing and audited accounts; security and enforcement history; fund segregation. |
| Platforms | 20% | Quality of web, mobile and third-party platforms; order types; charting; stability; demo availability. |
| Market range | 15% | Breadth and depth of tradable instruments, and whether you can own real assets or only CFDs. |
| Support | 10% | Speed and quality of human support, education resources, account-opening friction. |
Rules we hold ourselves to
- Commissions never touch scores. We earn referral commissions from some platforms. Scores are computed from the criteria above before any commercial relationship is considered, and several well-scored platforms pay us nothing.
- Every number has a verification date. Fee tables and regulation data carry a "data verified" stamp — currently August 2026. When a broker changes pricing, the dataset is updated and every affected page rebuilds.
- Honest dates. "Last updated" on a review means a real substantive update, not a cosmetic timestamp bump.
- Risk first. Leveraged products lose money for most retail traders. Reviews say so plainly and repeat each broker's own risk disclosure.
What a score means
- 9.0+ — exceptional; a category benchmark.
- 8.0–8.9 — excellent; recommendable with minor caveats.
- 7.0–7.9 — good; right for specific profiles.
- below 7.0 — significant weaknesses; we say exactly which.